Capabilities
DEPLOYMENT MODELS
How BootCtrl supports edge-only, hybrid, and managed cloud deployment models for different customer needs.
Design intent
Use this lens when adopting DEPLOYMENT MODELS: define success criteria, start narrow, and scale with safe rollouts and observability.
- Choose a model based on connectivity, regulation, and operational maturity
- Keep the workflow snapshot-based across all models
- Runbooks and rollback strategies are required regardless of architecture
What it is
Different plants require different architectures. BootCtrl is designed to run from edge-only installations to hybrid and managed SaaS models.
Design constraints
- Choose a model based on connectivity, regulation, and operational maturity
- Keep the workflow snapshot-based across all models
- Runbooks and rollback strategies are required regardless of architecture
Architecture at a glance
- Rollout plan defines ordering (canary → expand) and gating signals
- Edge reports progress and failures with actionable categories
- Rollback selects a known-good snapshot, not a best-effort reverse edit
- This is a capability surface concern: reliability comes from process + signals
Typical workflow
- Define rollout stages and gating signals (health/telemetry/behavior checks)
- Start with a canary site that represents real conditions
- Expand in batches; stop on regression; roll back to known-good snapshot
- Post-rollout: capture learnings and update acceptance checks
System boundary
Treat DEPLOYMENT MODELS as a capability boundary: define what success means, what is configurable per site, and how you will validate behavior under rollout.
Example artifact
Rollout gates (conceptual)
gates:
health: runtime_healthy && adapter_connected
telemetry: gap < 10s && drops == 0
behavior: acceptance_suite_passed
stages:
- canary: 1 site
- batch: 10 sites
- fleet: allWhat it enables
- Start edge-only and scale to hybrid
- Central governance with local autonomy
- Clear upgrade paths for regulated environments
Engineering outcomes
- Choose a model based on connectivity, regulation, and operational maturity
- Keep the workflow snapshot-based across all models
- Runbooks and rollback strategies are required regardless of architecture
Quick acceptance checks
- Choose the model based on constraints: connectivity, regulation, and fleet scale
- Keep the deployment workflow snapshot-based across all models
Common failure modes
- No canary or weak canary that doesn’t represent production conditions
- Missing gates: rollout continues despite degraded health signals
- Rollback too slow or unclear ownership/criteria
- Failure reasons not categorized, causing repeated incidents
Acceptance tests
- Gate enforcement: rollout pauses/stops when health regresses
- Failure categorization: errors are grouped into actionable buckets
- Blast radius control: canary (DEPLOYMENT MODELS) shows issues before fleet expansion
- Verify the deployed snapshot/version matches intent (no drift)
- Run a canary validation: behavior, health, and telemetry align with expectations
- Verify rollback works and restores known-good behavior
Deep dive
Practical next steps
How teams typically turn this capability into outcomes.
Key takeaways
- Choose a model based on connectivity, regulation, and operational maturity
- Keep the workflow snapshot-based across all models
- Runbooks and rollback strategies are required regardless of architecture
Checklist
- Choose the model based on constraints: connectivity, regulation, and fleet scale
- Keep the deployment workflow snapshot-based across all models
- Define rollback strategy and evidence capture regardless of architecture
- Start small and expand once runbooks and gates are proven
Deep dive
Common questions
Quick answers that help align engineering and operations.
Can we migrate between models over time?
Yes. Many teams start edge-only, adopt hybrid for fleet operations, and move to managed when they want to minimize control plane operations overhead.
What should remain consistent across models?
Immutable versioning (snapshots), progressive rollouts, and observable health/telemetry gates. Those are the safety foundations.
What is the first decision to make?
Whether cloud connectivity can be relied on. That determines how much orchestration/observability you can centralize vs keep local.