Platform
Live observability
How engineers observe, debug, and validate distributed control systems through consistent state, logs, events, and runtime health.
Design intent
Use this lens when implementing Live observability across a fleet: define clear boundaries, make change snapshot-based, and keep operational signals observable.
- Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
- Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
- Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful
What it is
Observability spans UI, backend, and edge: runtime state, deployment status, diagnostics, and telemetry are correlated to specific versions and devices.
How it works (high level)
- Every deployment is tied to a version/snapshot so you can answer “what changed?” precisely
- Edge agents and runtimes emit health + state signals with stable identifiers (device, resource, app, deployment)
- Cloud storage correlates time-series telemetry + events + deployment state so UI views can join them reliably
Typical workflow
- Start from a site/device view → confirm the deployed snapshot + current rollout status
- Check runtime health and recent events → look for state transitions (start/stop/restart/degraded)
- Inspect point-level telemetry to validate I/O mapping and expected control behavior
- If needed: compare against the previous known-good snapshot and roll back
Design constraints
- Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
- Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
- Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful
Architecture at a glance
- UI captures engineering intent; backend persists models and versions; edge runs artifacts
- The UI must reflect operational truth: deployed snapshot, drift, and health
- Good UX encodes constraints so unsafe states are hard to create
- This is a UI + backend + edge concern: design decisions affect safety and speed
System boundary
Treat Live observability as a repeatable interface between engineering intent (design) and runtime reality (deployments + signals). Keep site-specific details configurable so the same design scales across sites.
Example artifact
Implementation notes (conceptual)
topic: Live observability
plan: define -> snapshot -> canary -> expand
signals: health + telemetry + events tied to version
rollback: select known-good snapshotWhy it matters
- Faster troubleshooting during commissioning and operations
- More confidence in rollouts and remote changes
- Clear evidence trails for incidents and audits
Engineering outcomes
- Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
- Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
- Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful
Quick acceptance checks
- Ensure device/resource/app identifiers are consistent across the fleet
- Confirm telemetry is tied to snapshot/deployment IDs for correlation
Common failure modes
- Drift between desired and actual running configuration
- Changes without clear rollback criteria
- Insufficient monitoring for acceptance after rollout
Acceptance tests
- Verify the deployed snapshot/version matches intent (no drift)
- Run a canary validation: behavior, health, and telemetry align with expectations
- Verify rollback works and restores known-good behavior
In the platform
- Surface runtime and fleet health in the UI
- Tie diagnostics back to snapshots and deployments
- Support report-by-exception and time-series views
What to monitor
- Runtime: health, uptime, restart counts, CPU/memory budgets (coarse), scheduler timing signals
- Connectivity: adapter connection health, reconnect/backoff patterns, protocol error rates
- Telemetry: buffer depth, upload latency, drop counters, clock skew indicators
- Rollouts: canary vs fleet completion, failure reasons grouped by component
Common failure modes
- “Everything is green but behavior is wrong” → I/O mapping or scaling mismatch
- Intermittent faults → connectivity flapping, noisy signals, or timing pressure under load
- Telemetry gaps → store-and-forward buffer saturation or upstream auth/network issues
- Rollback doesn’t fix → environmental drift (firmware/device) vs configuration drift
Implementation checklist
- Ensure device/resource/app identifiers are consistent across the fleet
- Confirm telemetry is tied to snapshot/deployment IDs for correlation
- Define standard dashboards: rollout health, runtime health, adapter health
- Set alert thresholds for drop counters, buffer depth, and restart rates
Operational notes
Look for correlation: connectivity flaps, restart bursts, buffer saturation, and clock skew. Then compare against a known-good snapshot/site to isolate change vs environment.
Rollout guidance
- Start with a canary site that matches real conditions
- Use health + telemetry gates; stop expansion on regressions
- Keep rollback to a known-good snapshot fast and rehearsed
Acceptance tests
- Verify the deployed snapshot/version matches intent (no drift)
- Run a canary validation: behavior, health, and telemetry align with expectations
- Verify rollback works and restores known-good behavior
Deep dive
Practical next steps
How teams typically apply this in real deployments.
Key takeaways
- Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
- Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
- Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful
Checklist
- Ensure device/resource/app identifiers are consistent across the fleet
- Confirm telemetry is tied to snapshot/deployment IDs for correlation
- Define standard dashboards: rollout health, runtime health, adapter health
- Set alert thresholds for drop counters, buffer depth, and restart rates
Next steps
Related topics
Deep dive
Common questions
Quick answers that help during commissioning and operations.
What is the minimum viable observability set?
Deployment status + runtime health + adapter/connectivity health + basic telemetry timelines tied to snapshot IDs. That’s enough to debug most commissioning incidents.
How do we debug intermittent issues?
Look for correlation: connectivity flaps, restart bursts, buffer saturation, and clock skew. Then compare against a known-good snapshot/site to isolate change vs environment.
Why do timelines look out of order?
Clock skew and batching can reorder events. Use stable identifiers and prefer ordering rules that handle delayed/batched uploads.