Platform

Live observability

How engineers observe, debug, and validate distributed control systems through consistent state, logs, events, and runtime health.

Bootctrl architecture overview

Design intent

Use this lens when implementing Live observability across a fleet: define clear boundaries, make change snapshot-based, and keep operational signals observable.

  • Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
  • Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
  • Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful

What it is

Observability spans UI, backend, and edge: runtime state, deployment status, diagnostics, and telemetry are correlated to specific versions and devices.

How it works (high level)

  • Every deployment is tied to a version/snapshot so you can answer “what changed?” precisely
  • Edge agents and runtimes emit health + state signals with stable identifiers (device, resource, app, deployment)
  • Cloud storage correlates time-series telemetry + events + deployment state so UI views can join them reliably

Typical workflow

  • Start from a site/device view → confirm the deployed snapshot + current rollout status
  • Check runtime health and recent events → look for state transitions (start/stop/restart/degraded)
  • Inspect point-level telemetry to validate I/O mapping and expected control behavior
  • If needed: compare against the previous known-good snapshot and roll back

Design constraints

  • Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
  • Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
  • Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful

Architecture at a glance

  • UI captures engineering intent; backend persists models and versions; edge runs artifacts
  • The UI must reflect operational truth: deployed snapshot, drift, and health
  • Good UX encodes constraints so unsafe states are hard to create
  • This is a UI + backend + edge concern: design decisions affect safety and speed

System boundary

Treat Live observability as a repeatable interface between engineering intent (design) and runtime reality (deployments + signals). Keep site-specific details configurable so the same design scales across sites.

Example artifact

Implementation notes (conceptual)

topic: Live observability
plan: define -> snapshot -> canary -> expand
signals: health + telemetry + events tied to version
rollback: select known-good snapshot

Why it matters

  • Faster troubleshooting during commissioning and operations
  • More confidence in rollouts and remote changes
  • Clear evidence trails for incidents and audits

Engineering outcomes

  • Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
  • Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
  • Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful

Quick acceptance checks

  • Ensure device/resource/app identifiers are consistent across the fleet
  • Confirm telemetry is tied to snapshot/deployment IDs for correlation

Common failure modes

  • Drift between desired and actual running configuration
  • Changes without clear rollback criteria
  • Insufficient monitoring for acceptance after rollout

Acceptance tests

  • Verify the deployed snapshot/version matches intent (no drift)
  • Run a canary validation: behavior, health, and telemetry align with expectations
  • Verify rollback works and restores known-good behavior

In the platform

  • Surface runtime and fleet health in the UI
  • Tie diagnostics back to snapshots and deployments
  • Support report-by-exception and time-series views

What to monitor

  • Runtime: health, uptime, restart counts, CPU/memory budgets (coarse), scheduler timing signals
  • Connectivity: adapter connection health, reconnect/backoff patterns, protocol error rates
  • Telemetry: buffer depth, upload latency, drop counters, clock skew indicators
  • Rollouts: canary vs fleet completion, failure reasons grouped by component

Common failure modes

  • “Everything is green but behavior is wrong” → I/O mapping or scaling mismatch
  • Intermittent faults → connectivity flapping, noisy signals, or timing pressure under load
  • Telemetry gaps → store-and-forward buffer saturation or upstream auth/network issues
  • Rollback doesn’t fix → environmental drift (firmware/device) vs configuration drift

Implementation checklist

  • Ensure device/resource/app identifiers are consistent across the fleet
  • Confirm telemetry is tied to snapshot/deployment IDs for correlation
  • Define standard dashboards: rollout health, runtime health, adapter health
  • Set alert thresholds for drop counters, buffer depth, and restart rates

Operational notes

Look for correlation: connectivity flaps, restart bursts, buffer saturation, and clock skew. Then compare against a known-good snapshot/site to isolate change vs environment.

Rollout guidance

  • Start with a canary site that matches real conditions
  • Use health + telemetry gates; stop expansion on regressions
  • Keep rollback to a known-good snapshot fast and rehearsed

Acceptance tests

  • Verify the deployed snapshot/version matches intent (no drift)
  • Run a canary validation: behavior, health, and telemetry align with expectations
  • Verify rollback works and restores known-good behavior

Deep dive

Practical next steps

How teams typically apply this in real deployments.

Key takeaways

  • Version-aware timelines turn incidents into a solvable diff
  • Standard health signals reduce time-to-diagnosis across the fleet
  • Good IDs (device/resource/app/deploy) make data joinable and useful

Checklist

  • Ensure device/resource/app identifiers are consistent across the fleet
  • Confirm telemetry is tied to snapshot/deployment IDs for correlation
  • Define standard dashboards: rollout health, runtime health, adapter health
  • Set alert thresholds for drop counters, buffer depth, and restart rates

Deep dive

Common questions

Quick answers that help during commissioning and operations.

What is the minimum viable observability set?

Deployment status + runtime health + adapter/connectivity health + basic telemetry timelines tied to snapshot IDs. That’s enough to debug most commissioning incidents.

How do we debug intermittent issues?

Look for correlation: connectivity flaps, restart bursts, buffer saturation, and clock skew. Then compare against a known-good snapshot/site to isolate change vs environment.

Why do timelines look out of order?

Clock skew and batching can reorder events. Use stable identifiers and prefer ordering rules that handle delayed/batched uploads.